Why I Celebrate Thanksgiving

7
by on November 24, 2011 at 11:18 pm

I celebrate Thanksgiving because I am thankful.

I am thankful to this amazing country that we call the United States of America. My grandparents came here after they survived concentration camp, and they were plenty thankful that they were given a refuge after the hell they went through in Europe. They celebrated Thanksgiving every year, with an elaborate meal shared with friends and relatives. They were more than happy to show their appreciation for this country.

And while everyone always points out America’s faults and goes on about how horrible it is to live here, and yeah, there are definitely plenty of things that need to be changed, I think this country is pretty freaking incredible.

Cool stuff I can do as an American woman without getting thrown into jail or executed:

1. Write articles that criticizes the government and its officials
2. Wear what I want
3. Vote
4. Run for public office
5. Drive
6. Get an abortion
7. Use birth control
8. Pursue a higher education
9. Play in a professional sports team
10. Marry who I want
11. Have a credit card in my own name
12. Own property
13. Get a divorce and have custody of my children
14. Receive equal pay for equal work

I know a lot of these things aren’t as great as they seem. No, there is no WNFL, gay marriage is only legal in a few states, and reproductive rights are being threatened and limited every day (among many other unfair practices). But there are women’s football teams and leagues, same-sex couples can be united in marriage in a few states, and women are able to get abortions and use birth control if they choose. In the nineteenth century (and even the mid-twentieth), most of the things listed above weren’t even dreamed of, let alone enacted. Other countries are, unfortunately, at the same point as America in 1850.

So that’s why I’m thankful to this country, and why I celebrate Thanksgiving. Thank you, America. Please continue improving in how awesome you are.

in Women's Issues

, , , , , ,

JustNat: Gay Marriage Not a Matter of MPs Conscience

1
by on November 22, 2011 at 10:28 am

Although the federal government does not recognize same-sex marriage in the United States, such marriages are recognized by some individual states. There are 6 states that grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples: Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont. Maryland recognizes same-sex marriages but does not grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Despite this apparent progress, the legalization of same-sex marriage in the US has been driven by court rulings and legislative action, rather than voter referendums[1].

However, public support in recent years for its legalization has grown considerably in the US. Several recent polls have shown support for legalized same-sex marriage above 50%, but the issue remains politically divisive.

In my home country of Australia, a recent Age/Nielsen poll of 1400 taken earlier this month shows a growing majority of Australians favour legalising same-sex marriage. Sixty-two percent of voters would like to see gay marriage legalised, a rise from 57% a year ago, while only 31% are opposed, compared with 37% in November 2010. The poll shows there is majority support in every mainland state, with support greater among women than men (71-53%)[2].

Photo: theblackletter.com.au

Prime Minister Julia Gillard recently announced a conscience vote for Labor MPs on gay marriage at next month’s party conference. Given the personal nature of the issue and the deeply held beliefs, a conscience vote for MPs (Members of Parliament) is appropriate, Ms. Gillard says, so they can decide ”according to their own values and beliefs.” In response, the Australian Rainbow Labor Network said a conscience vote was not the answer. “Matters of equality should not be the subject of a conscience vote,” spokesman Andrew Barr said.

There have been two sides of reaction to this move. Some gay men and lesbians will see a conscience vote as a defeat, though it may not be. Even if Labor backs gay marriage now, they don’t have the numbers in the current Parliament for change (there is strong opposition from the Coalition and conservative crossbenchers). Some believe once a conscience vote is granted, it will only be a matter of time before the Parliament throws open marriage to gay couples.

Many are angered however, believing that a conscience vote would doom a private member’s bill because Labor MPs would be split, while the Coalition would vote solidly against.

In addition, despite supporting the conscience vote, the Prime Minister also wants opposition to gay marriage to stay in the ALP (Australian Labor Party) platform, which will be debated at the December party conference. The current platform (the party’s guiding statement of principles) urges Labor to pursue ”official recognition” for all couples. Enter the proviso: ”These reforms are to be implemented consistently with Labor’s commitment to maintaining the definition of marriage as currently set out in the Marriage Act.” In Australia, the Marriage Act was changed in 2004 to unequivocally define marriage as only between a man and a woman.

My opinion on the matter; I’m disgusted. Totally and utterly. Disgusted that the Prime Minister would cast such crucial matters as the equal rights of the Australian GLBTIQ community as a matter of MPs conscience. Disgusted that a person’s right to marry another of the same sex is seen as something to debate as ethical or not, when it is obviously so important to heterosexuals. Disgusted that the very people who hold the ‘sanctity of marriage’ so dear aren’t so quick to acknowledge that the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman only came about in 2004 when the Marriage Act was changed.  I didn’t hear an outcry back then that it was being touched!

I acknowledge that it is the current Labor government that removed discrimination against same-sex couples in more than 80 areas of the law[3]. That is not good enough. It’s not even a matter of a majority rule anymore as the majority of Australians are now in favour of equal marriage rights, and our elected politicians should create policy that reflects the wants and needs of the public they represent.

This conscience vote is a political ploy by Gillard to play both sides and win and I won’t stand for it. It is only a matter of time before same-sex marriage is legalised and now, more than ever, we need to fight for our rights! Don’t just sit back and wait for it to happen. Make it happen!

  • Have a conversation with someone close to you about the issue.
  • Email your local MP (Labor or Liberal or whatever) and let them know how you feel about the upcoming conscience vote.
  • Better yet, if you have a phone, make a call to them. You can make your voice heard… literally!

 

If you are in Sydney, show your support for Gay Marriage:

Convergence outside the ALP National Conference, 3 December 2011:

Rally to change the ALP’s platform to allow marriage equality.

Sydney, Australia
Saturday 3 December, 12-3pm, Hyde Park North at the Archibald fountain (Sydney)
Contact: email
Ben Cooper – 0434 082 229
Cat Rose – 0405 770 302
Facebook event here
Website: http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/wp/events/upcoming-rallies-for-marriage-equality/

 


[1] Wiki: Same-sex marriage in the United States, http://tiny.cc/z5wdc

[2] Michelle Grattan, PM grants conscience vote, dooming gay marriage, Nov 2011, http://tiny.cc/gg75q

[3] Penny Wong, Marriage of equality is a core value for all to hold dear, Nov 2011, http://tiny.cc/oixqb

, , , , , , ,

Theatre Review: "The Judy Show"

13
by on July 9, 2011 at 5:50 pm

by Jonathan Warman

Out lesbian Judy Gold has a long history as a successful stand-up comedian, but in the last few years she has turned to evenings that combine a stand-up vibe with a more theatrical structure (with help from Beebo Brinker Chronicles co-writer Kate Moira Ryan). Her hit show 25 Questions for a Jewish Mother focused, as you would expect from the title, on Jewish motherhood – Judy’s relationship with her mother, her relationship with her own kids, as well as broader questions asked of any Jewish mother that would take the time to answer (which was plenty of mothers).

 

Her new piece The Judy Show sketches a broader autobiographical story, using the lens of her lifelong obsession with sitcoms. Early in the show, Judy reflects on what classic sitcoms taught her about the world, and what desires they stirred in her. As we approach the present day, those desires transform into a mission for Judy to get her own sitcom, and she hilariously and poignantly re-creates the many ill-fated pitch sessions she’s had with networks over the years.

 

Judy sings a number of sitcom themes (including the ones she’s penned for her own show), accompanying herself on piano, with subtle multimedia by designer Andrew Boyce. Before and after everything else, however, Gold is among the funniest stand up comedians working today, and she’s at her best when she’s scoring bulls-eyes with piercing observations (with colorful additional material by funny gay male Bob Smith and Rosie O’Donnell and Bette Midler scribe Eric Kornfeld). I’ll just put this plainly: Judy Gold is fucking hilarious, and can also be very touching. The Judy Show is tons of fun and I can’t recommend it enough, you really should see it.

 

For tickets, click here.

 

For more reviews and interviews by Jonathan Warman, see his blog Drama Queen.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Corporal Andrew Wilfahrt dies shortly after DADT Repeal!

4
by on July 5, 2011 at 9:12 pm

andrew

Today CNN reports on Corporal Andrew Wilfahrt, a person believed to be the first gay U.S. soldier to die in battle since President Obama signed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” He died from a bomb detonation in Afghanistan in February 27, 2011. Now his parents fight on his behalf for marriage equality in Minnesota.

It reminds us of Minnesota state Republican Representative John Kriesel, an Iraq veteran who lost both of his legs in war and came back to the mainland to vote for equal rights on behalf of all Americans—now that’s what we call a real freedom fighter!

in News

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

CNN's Kyra Phillips vs. Ex-NFL Player David Tyree!

2
by on June 20, 2011 at 5:07 pm

Take 8:37 of your time to watch CNN’s Kyra Phillips dismantle former NFL player David Tyree. Tyree made a video for the National Organization of Marriage in which he called marriage equality unnatural and said it would lead to anarchy.

CNN’s Kyra Phillips really goes after him and Tyree fumbles his ball. Let us know what you think!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
in Gay Marriage, News

, , , , , , , , , ,

This Just In…